Joe Sixpack
666 Styx Way
Cucamonga, California, united States
650-999-9999//YukFu@Gmail.com

To:  Ham Burger
       Cruel and Crabbage Law Firm

In Re: In Re Matter of Joe Sixpack

	On advice of Counsel, I have just become aware that the purported probate of the Estate of Jerry Jerkoff, occurred in a ‘court’ which ALL ‘official’ actors knew, or SHOULD have known, acted coram non judice nunc pro tunc ab initio.

	As such, I now understand that the record in any ensuing action would establish, by at least clear and convincing relevant, admissible evidence, ALL of the following structural, jurisdictional errors, any ONE of which a Jury could find justifies any and all of our claims of deceit, fraud and even Treason to the Constitution for the united States {1787-1791} (CuS), on the part of ALL such ‘official’ actors, to wit:

	In this regard, I am hopeful of settling the purported matter of the Estate of Jerry Jerkoff, most particularly with regard to the seemingly unprecedented situation existing in this matter in which I NEVER received (effective) service of process or ANY opportunity to be heard, cardinal principles of American jurisprudence known and understood by the Framers of the CuS, and “We the people”, who ordained and established “this Constitution”, and all government, “to establish the blessings of liberty to ourselves and OUR posterity: 

That CALIFORNIA is NOT (!) a sovereign, independent State admitted into “this Union”, all the appearances to the apparent contrary notwithstanding;

That CALIFORNIA, and all like situated States, admitted prior to 1860, have been relegated, on who knows WHAT lawful factual foundation and legal basis consistent with the CuS, to, at best (!) federal (insular ??) territorial possessions;

As such, CONgress, assuming arguendo that it has a ‘quorum to do bu$ine$$ in either House, does NOT have any authority to provide for elections in such territories for President (Electoral College, anyone ??), VOTING members of the House and with united States Senator remaining an appointed position by State legislatures, which, alas, no longer exist;

In any event, there are NO ‘qualified’ members in either House of CONgress, since ALL such members are REQUIRED to be ‘inhabitants of the State which they represent’

The ‘coop de grass’ is that there are NO elections in any event, since Voter Registration forms require the victim, er ‘voter’, to declare, under penalty of perjury, that he “owes” his “United States citizenship” to Section 1 of what the record will fully establish, in any ensuing action, no doubt in front of an inflamed Jury with the power to rule on the facts and the law, is the NON-existent 14th war “amendment” (NEFWA).

Indeed, the ‘US supreme Court, contemporaneously ruled NEFWA unconstitutional, but were not ‘permitted’ (?!) to announce their decision in Ex Parte McCardle 7 Wall. 506. 
Today, however, your close attention to the VERY recent decisions of the US supreme Court in Texas v California and Ohio v OSHA (my annotated version of the “concurring” opinion accompanying), will reveal a Court which has, VERY arguably, acted as the Article III judicial Court it was ordained and established to be, this for seemingly the first time in 90 years AND for reasons which it will be a great pleasure to explain to an inflamed Jury, what with a daunting amount of relevant, admissible documentary evidence, in concert with the a cappella expert witness testimony of Counsel, in any ensuing action as might occur, knowing that the US supreme Court will ‘have our backs’, especially on matters involving LIMITS on the commerce clause powers of CONgress.

This will include, for example, the FACT that the allegedly applicable CALIFORNIA Constitution of 1879, makes NO mention of the “People of the State of California”, and it does NOT vest the judicial power of the State of California in ANY Court, nor does it need to do so, since the all that ‘officially’ exists is the SUBORDINATE corporate body politic of NEFWA, which the record would establish, in any ensuing action, that this was the  carefully concealed intent of NEWFA, members of which are “born or naturalized in the (Trust known as the) United States and SUBJECT to the jurisdiction thereof”, which ‘have NO Rights which the (de facto national socialist) government is bound to respect”.

Also well worthy of note is the fact that in any ensuing action, a long train of abuses, not to mention violations of Rights secured by ALL 6 Articles of the CuS, in many other cases, including a LOT of them from the San Mateo county superior “court”, WILL be relevant, admissible evidence, and might even ‘wake up’ (NOT ‘woke’ up !) even the mindless, mainstream media, ‘encouraging’ journalists to do their jobs as members of the Fourth Estate to report the (gasp !) TRUTH to the American people.

Your attention is directed to the fact that no KNOWN attempt to make effective service of process, this to likely probable beneficiaries of the Estate, yet  another structural, jurisdictional error, perhaps because, as you will learn in any ensuing action, this was and is IMPOSSIBLE to do.

Accordingly, your very close attention is directed to the decision of the US supreme Court in Windsor v McVeigh 93 US 274, pursuant to the denial of any opportunity to be heard at all, which leaves little to the imagination in this area, not to mention even more structural, jurisdictional errors all ‘official’ actors will not see coming, yet had the SWORN duty to know and discharge.

Notably, had  I somehow been actively involved in the probate action, we would NOT have had any idea where we were or why; indeed there exists a striking discord between at least the “judicial” and Executive departments of the CALIFORNIA government, as an exemplar, assuming arguendo that they exist at all which, yet again, will be established by more of that relevant, admissible documentary evidence, that the former has stated, albeit ‘courtesy’ of  a summary, ex parte 12(b)(6) “denial” of Counsel’s UNOPPOSED Petition for a Non-statutory federal Writ of Habeas Corpus /aka/ since Magna Charta as the “Great Writ of Liberty”, this by a DEPUTY jerk clerk (??) of the CALIFORNIA supreme Court, that:

‘the questions you ask are BEYOND the jurisdiction of California courts as they appear to raise federal issues’.
Not only is this correct, it is a concession that, exactly as we will be claiming, WITH attitude and WITH authority, that CALIFORNIA, and all like situated States, is NOT a sovereign, independent State admitted into “this Union”.  Had the Justices any of this ON THE RECORD, they would no doubt be in close proximity to Cell 2455 San Quentin prison.

Yet in stark contrast to this, with the Secretary of State conceding that “The California Constitution of 1849 has NOT (!) been repealed”, more of that ‘pesky’ relevant, admissible documentary evidence, would be assertively presented to a common law Jury, WITH the power to rule on the facts and the law, to get their decision on this matter, EITHER way of which is a WIN for me, and all of us.

Article VI, Section 1 clearly and unambiguously establishes the California District Court as a constitutional, common law Court, contemporaneously recognized as such by the California supreme Court (thankfully PRE-Tani et al) – see e.g. Ex parte Knowles 5 Cal. 300, and Article VI, Section 7 provides that: 

“The District Courts shall have original jurisdiction, in law and equity, in all civil cases where the amount in dispute exceeds two hundred dollars, exclusive of interest. In all criminal cases not otherwise provided for, and in all issues of fact joined in the probate courts, their jurisdiction shall be unlimited”

No doubt this is true in ALL States admitted into “this Union”. Do you suppose that a Jury, assuming arguendo that you have any status and standing in a judicial Court, will have any problem understanding this clear and concise language ??

And we haven’t even discussed the multiple outright denials of UNOPPOSED Non-statutory federal Writs of Habeas Corpus in other cases which have occurred, each one of which are acts of Treason – Cohens, infra.

All of this, however, can be avoided if we can reach a good faith, timely, and mutually agreeable settlement, one reflecting both the magnitude of the issues arising from ALL 6 Articles of the CuS, punitive and exemplary damages and, very probably, including amounts stemming from ‘official’ actors in positions of “honor, profit and trust” in the de facto government, like your Governor, your local Dumb Ass and black robed bastards , committing multiple acts of Treason to the Constitution as per Cohens v Virginia 6 Wheat. 264:

“It is most true that this Court will not take jurisdiction if it should not; but it is equally true that it must take jurisdiction if it should. The judiciary cannot, as the legislature may, avoid a measure because it approaches the confines of the Constitution. We cannot pass it by because it is doubtful. With whatever doubts, with whatever difficulties, a case may be attended, we must decide it if it be brought before us. We have no more right to decline the exercise of jurisdiction which is given than to usurp that which is not given. The one or the other would be treason to the Constitution.”

Not even mentioned yet is the fact that there was and IS no KNOWN right to effective assistance counsel, this in what would be established to be at least a quasi-criminal jurisdiction, simply NOT attainable from any ‘state’ Bar A$$ociation attorneys /aka/ unregistered foreign agents of  at least the City of London, which have irreconcilable conflicts of interest with at least lawful, de jure, jus sanguinis State Citizens, and without any meaningful and substantive curricula in the mandatory public “education”  system for the study of the Constitution, history and laws of the united States,, no way to have known about any of these structural, jurisdictional errors, thus NO allegedly applicable statutes of limitation are involved here.
 In closing, I note that in any ensuing action, both you and your cohorts, not to mention ALL of the other ‘official’ actors /aka/ ‘perps’, involved, will face a withering, unrelenting cross-examination by Counsel UNFILTERED (!) by any of your ‘usually reliable’ ‘state’ Bar A$$ociation attorneys.

Your PROMPT attention to this matter will be expected.

____________________________
Joe Sixpack