The Schweitzer Files

As Used by LeRoy Schweitzer and his Legal Retinue

among those great modern American Heros known collectively as

The Montana Freemen

There is a book by Pat Shannon documenting the story of Montana Freemen. Its available through the Americans Bulletin Newspaper, run by Robert Kelly in the Medford Oregon area. They also carry an excerpt of the best citations from the Voluminous Book: "Anderson on the Uniform Commercial Code", which is quite helpful to the serious student. This last book on the UCC and the so-hard to find "Bankers Handbook" were the two main reference materials which Mr Schweitzer and the Freemen used to shake the Commercial foundations of the Evil Empire of modern Babylon to its knees.

They had to shut the Freemen down. If they did not, Babylon itself would have fallen. The Freemen had used Lawfully Valid Commercial Process to pay off the National Debt. They had driven many Lawless Godless DeFacto Pablovian Dog Mercenaries who belligerently crossed their paths into bankruptcy. Judges could not sell their fancy homes when they left town to retire from their plunder to a warmer climate, because the liens on the houses prevented bank re-financing.

The Commercial Process used here is Rock Solid under Modern Commercial Law, as

codified within every states version of the Uniform Commercial Code (frequently UCC).

This is better than Law School folks. Mr Schweitzer did so much for this movement, that in this author's opinion, he is the greatest hero of modern times. His Lawless ImPrisonment is just another testimony of Faith in Jesus Christ, who was also Tortured and Brutalized as he was Nailed to the Cross by the exact same form of Roman Civil-Military Government in alliance with "those who claim they are Jews, but are Not, but are of the Synagogue of Satin" just as Jesus Christ spoke.

The use of Paper Contracts to "proceed against all the goods and land of the defaulting

debtor", was brought about by just such an alliance, as described in a soon to be here posted excerpt from the Georgetown Law Journal, and as obtained by this author by way of another unsung hero and cutting edge Scholar of the Commercial Lien Process; one: Hartford VanDyke, of the Battleground Washington area.

In the opinion of this author and Hartford VanDyke, Mr Schweitzer errored in presuming

that Commercial-Law was a subset of Common-Law. This author believes that this common

mis-understanding comes from the more foundational common error in assuming that it was a true form of Common-Law which was still functioning after the Norman Conquest of 1066. This appears to this author to be the most significant error in the research of almost all Modern Common-Law Scholars, and it is quite understandable that such greats as Mr Schweitzer and other respected heros in this movement have fallen victim to it.

Once it is understood that True Common-Law ceased to exist after the Norman Conquest (for all practical purposes) then it becomes clear that the Commercial-Law and Law of Contracts is not a true part of True Common-Law.

Commercial-Law is based upon what was known as "The Law Merchant", which was basically just the Law of Contracts, and of Commercial-Law for Negotiable and Non-Negotiable "True Bill" Instruments thereunder.

Because the Conquering Norman Kings waged Propaganda and Economic War against the Conquered Anglo-Saxons, and because the Anglo-Saxons eventually became Indoctrinated into their newly imposed Slavery, and because the History Books are very thin in documenting these realities of the true nature of the Evil which we battle:

Thus it is commonly mis-construed that Common-Law existed after the Norman Conquest. Many prominent University Scholars emphatically insist that it is an Honest use of the term CommonLaw to identify that system which was Imposed over the Anglo-Saxon People after Norman Conquest, and continuing clear up until the times of the American Revolution.	Noteworthily, the Anglo-Saxon system was momentarily allowed small short bloomings, mostly as a result of Magna Carta's great triumph, as a result of the Courageous Barons holding the Norman King at sword point to get him to agree to it. However, the local Anglo-Saxon True Common-Law Courts of the Hundred and County, were but rare and momentary bright spots in the otherwise gloomy and Brutal Feudal Roman Modeled System imposed by the Normans.

But Honesty of Words demands that Terms be defined with specificity, and because it is acknowledged on all fronts that the CommonLaw was derived from the Anglo-Saxons, and because All Honorable Scholars will concede that the Centralizing Influences of the Judicial Process brought about through the Norman Conquest (for all practical purposes) eventually destroyed the Anglo-Saxon De-Centralized Method of proceeding at Common-Law, thus the Discriminating Logician will clearly Deduce that the use of the term "Common-Law" to identify most of the Judicial Process developed after the Norman Conquest, is grievously In Error.

But these thoughts are more fully explored in the Anglo-Saxon Section of this Web Page, which presents much greater detail. Refer there for further study. For this section all we need to know is that the Law Merchant and the practically synonymous Commercial-Law and Law of Contracts has all frequently been mis-took for a sub-division of true CommonLaw process.

The fact that there is a difference here did not play any significant role in the legitimacy of the Schweitzer Lien Process.

It is a principle of True CommonLaw, as practiced by the Anglo-Saxons, that where there is a Wrong, there will be a Remedy. Modern America is swamped in Commercial Law. CommonLaw is superior to Commercial Law (a point upon which this author is in disagreement with the respected Mr Van Dyke). This author argues that True Common-Law can make use of Commercial-Law to afford a Remedy to those Sovereign Free Men and Women within the Common-Law Jurisdiction (at which point Mr Van Dyke seems in agreement), and at which point Mr Schweitzer seems to have pushed the envelope in merging the differing Legal Remedy fields available to Modern Courtroom Warriors into one Dynamic Remedy, all farther than any man alive thus far.

But the truth will bear witness to its self: Examine the documents listed below carefully. Study them closely. Mr Schweitzer gained strength from being able to "Speak-Law" from his own "Juris-Diction" in the Constitutionally Recognizable "Foreign Jurisdiction" of Justice Township, within the Independent Nation (for judicial and commercial purposes) of Montana. Its how the Nation was set up. Its part of the Constitutional Blue-Print.

Sorry, we've all been lied to. We are all Free men and women. The government run schools lied to us. Were fortunate to be finding this out now.

Thank you Mr Schweitzer.