From the
“Christian/Israelite Common-Law 
Court of Justice, for the People of Oregon”
Articles of Incorporation into the Constitutionally-Lawful “Sate of Oregon”
Filed with the Secretary of State: 27-September-2000; Registry #: 767103-84.

Memorandum
in Support of Documents Titled similarly to:
‘Court of Justice Jury Trial Verdict of Not Guilty’,
& ‘Constructive Notice to Judge &/or Deputies to Not Commit Treason’.
V-2.

For the Information & Education of those Persons who have been presented with the above described Documents, this Memorandum has been Composed & Presented.  Please note that this Memorandum is a “Courtesy”, because with regard to True “Law”, in it’s “General” & “Public” Nature, the ancient & well settled “Maxim” of the Traditional “Common-Law”, does apply:
          “Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat”, ie: “Ignorance of Law is No Excuse.” (Black’s 5th Law Dictionary) 

Here-under, please note that Each of You “Public-Servants” is Personally Responsible for how He/She fulfills His/Her “Duties” with regard to the “Un-Alienable-Rights” of the Accused.  And perhaps the first thing to Get Clear, is our Character & Status as Free Men & Women under “Almighty-God”.  We hold ourselves as the “Covenant-People” of YHVH, just as described in the Old Testament & Torah” of the Bible, & as brought into Perfection by His Son, the “Prince of Peace”, the Christ/Messiah, Jesus/Yeshua.  We Seek (to the best of our ability) to Obey YHVH’s Higher & Supreme Sociological “Natural-Laws” of “Truth”, “Justice”, & “Peace”.  These are all based upon what is described in the Original Greek “New-Testament” as “Agapai”, & which is commonly translated as “Love”; but which is described with more accuracy in modern American/English as “Loyalty” &/or “Allegiance”.  As Summarized by Christ, we must First be Loyal to YHVH, the Supreme God of the Universe; & Secondarily, we must be Loyal to each other, as Neighbors.  The First Law of “Loyalty to God” frequently reflects the Second Law of “Loyalty to Neighbor”, because God Desires us to Care for each-other’s welfare.  By this Mechanism, we Speak-Out Against Violations of Godly-Justice on our Neighbors. Here-by, Both Laws are Supported. 
We have (perhaps begrudgingly) come to the humbled knowledge that on a Comparative-Basis to the Only Alternative to Godly-Law, that His “Load is Light” & Comparatively Easy to Bear.  We have been Kicked & Abused Sufficiently by the many other forms of so-called “Law”, to now Know that That Pathway is Not Our Pathway.  We now humbly Seek Conformity with YHVH’s Supreme & Higher Sociologically “Natural-Laws”, & there-under to learn & practice Mature & Responsible “Self-Governance”, just as does appear to have been blessedly passed down by the forefathers of our Modern Anglo-American Society through the “Conscience” Sensitive Model of “Self-Governing” which the Twelve Disciples of Christ Jesus did Unanimously Follow.  These details of the Ancient Christian Religious Roots of Modern British/American Jurisprudence & “Common-Law”, require delving into some Brief but serious ancient History.  This Memorandum is Not Exhaustive of this History, nor of its applicability in modern concerns.  Exhaustive discussion of these Issues will be more fully attempted at a later date, & in another document.  This “Memorandum” is designed to support the “Here & Now” concerns of a particular Accused Person in a relatively brief & efficient manner; & such delving into lengthy detail is counterproductive to those ends.

Brief Historical Outline:
The start of this “Self-Governing” concept is 3400 years ago, under Moses & the “Torah” Codes, as follows:
Exodus 18: 21: Moreover thou shalt provide out of all the people able men, such as fear God, men of truth, hating covetousness; and place such over them, to be rulers of thousands, and rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens: 22   And let them judge the people at all seasons: and it shall be, that every great matter they shall bring unto thee, but every small matter they shall judge: so shall it be easier for thyself, and they shall bear the burden with thee. 23   If thou shalt do this thing, and God command thee so, then thou shalt be able to endure, and all this people shall also go to their place in peace.
24 So Moses hearkened to the voice of his father in law, and did all that he had said. 25 And Moses chose able men out of all Israel, and made them heads over the people, rulers of thousands, rulers of hundreds, rulers of fifties, and rulers of tens.  26  And they judged the people at all seasons: the hard causes they brought unto Moses, but every small matter they judged themselves. ...
Deuteronomy 1: 5  ... Moses to declare this law, saying, 6  The LORD our God spake unto us in Horeb, saying ...  12  How can I myself alone bear your cumbrance, and your burden, and your strife? 13 Take you wise men, and understanding, and known among your tribes, and I will make them rulers over you.
14   And ye answered me, and said, The thing which thou hast spoken is good for us to do. 15  So I took the chief of your tribes, wise men, and known, and made them heads over you, captains over thousands, and captains over hundreds, and captains over fifties, and captains over tens, and officers among your tribes. 
16 And I charged your judges at that time, saying, Hear the causes between your brethren, and judge righteously between every man and his brother, and the stranger that is with him. 17 Ye shall not respect persons in judgment; but ye shall hear the small as well as the great; ye shall not be afraid of the face of man; for the judgment is God's: and the cause that is too hard for you, bring it unto me, and I will hear it.
18   And I commanded you at that time all the things which ye should do.” 

Each of the above Old Testament Judeo-Christian-Israelite Biblical References clearly establishes that these units of “Ten’s, Fifties, Hundreds, &Thousands” are the smaller “Self-Governing” entities which were practiced among the Godly People of Israel, 3400 years ago.  These were “Able Men, such as Fear God, Men of Truth, Hating Covetousness”.  These are the True Israelites & Jews.  Always were, always will be.  Christ Jesus was organizing the Nation of Israel, under his Kingdom along the precise same 10's, 50's, 100's & 1000's organizational Structure/Model of Moses & Israel, as shown by the following: 
Mark 6: 34   And Jesus ... was moved with compassion toward them, because they were as sheep not having a shepherd: and he began to teach them many things. ... 39 And he commanded them to make all sit down by companies upon the green grass. 40 And they sat down in ranks, by hundreds, and by fifties. ... 44 And they that did eat of the loaves were about five thousand men.
Luke 9: 14  For they were about five thousand men. And he said to his disciples, Make them sit down by fifties in a company. 15 And they did so, and made them all sit down.

This clearly shows Christ Jesus was organizing his Israelite-Jewish Nation along that Precise Same Manner which Moses had set-up for the Israelite Nation, as they all “Administered Justice” among themselves in the precise same De-Centralized & “Conscionable” Manner.  Jesus was clearly taking the Mosaic-Codes Seriously.  That is because they Actually “Worked” as a Sociological-Mechanism for “Divining Natural Law”.  This “Pattern” carried on into Anglo-American Jurisprudence; & close study of History, Reveals that the way that it has gotten here, is through the profound influence of the Teachings of “Christ Jesus”.  
Further evidence that the Christians were seriously following the previously-mentioned “Torah” based Mosaic Codes, is because this precise same-Model existed as the Common practice (Law) in Great Britain prior to the 1066 ad “Norman-Conquest”.  Much Survived even After that Evil Event, by-way of such heroic efforts as that of “Magna-Charta” & Coke.  It is a Historical Fact that the Peoples of both pre-1066 Norman-Conquest Britain, & the People who’s Delegates Framed the Constitutions of the United States & Oregon, All of these Cultures were Related by way of their Monumental Respect of these Biblical Passages, & their Firm Belief that God’s “Holy-Spirit” Flowed to the People by way of their Conformity there-to. 
This all shows How & Why it is Reasonably Construable that these Ancient Statutes of Moses, were “Originally-Intended” by the Framers of these Constitutions, to have been Effectively Incorporated into Modern American & Oregon “Constitutional-Law”.  It is still there, because the “Intent” of the Framers of these Constitutions  “Is the Laws”.  It’s Hasn’t Changed.  It’s just not modernly Fashionable to use.  It is Documented in Recent History that this practice of the Ancient Mosaic Codes of De-Centralized “Self-Governing” has “Survived” the Oppressive Warfare of it’s Antagonists, & that it has done so from with-in it’s “Circle of Christian Nations”; such as Britian, Germany, & a few others, just as is revealed as follows:
“International Law: The system of rules which Christian states acknowledge to be obligatory upon them in their relations to each other and to each other’s subjects. It is jus inter gentes, as distinguished from the jus gentium . The scientific basis for these rules is to be found in Natural Law, or the doctrine of rights and of the state; for nations, like smaller communities and individuals, have rights and correlative obligations, moral claims and duties. Hence it might seem as if the science consisted simply of deductions from certain fundamental propositions of natural right ... 
It would be true to say that this science, like every department of moral science, can require nothing unjust ... . ... a great part of the modern improvement s in this code are due to the spirit of humanity ... leading the circle of Christian nations freely ... for the sake of mutual convenience or good will. The excellent works of Ward and of Wheaton are of the highest use to all who would study the science as it ought to be studied, as the offshoot and index of a progressive Christian civilization. ... It can only be said that the practice of Christian states is growing more and more liberal, both as admitting foreigners into their territories and to the enjoyment of those rights of persons and property which the natives posses, and as regards domiciling them, or even incorporating them, afterwards, if they desire it, into the body politic.
The answers ... are given in private international law, or the conflict of law, as it is sometimes called, - a very interesting branch of law, as showing how Christian nations are coming from age to age nearer to one another in their views of the private relations of men. ... Councils have almost none of the privileges of ambassadors, except beyond the pale of Christianity. John Bovier’s “Law Dictionary”, 1868 -1870.

This citation & many others similar Prove that a Polarity was in place back in the 1800's between “Christian Nations” & those who were Not of that “Circle”.  Mr Bovier goes on to shed more precious Light on this Polarity, by way of his further definition of the following term:
“Infidel”: One who does not believe in the existence of a God who will reward or punish in this world or that which is to come. One who professes no religion that can bind his conscience to speak the truth. ... Under the term infidel Lord Coke comprises Jews & Heathens ... . ”

Although it may perhaps be argued that Coke, & perhaps even Bovier; are “Anti-Semite” for the derogatory reference to those who “Say they are Jews”,  & for effectively portraying them as having “No ... Conscience”, that is a side/collateral point of great inflammability & distraction, & it is not immediately necessary to delve into it.  The Main Point herein is that the above described “Circle of Christian Nations” is well recognized as being “Bound by” the Higher Godly Laws of “Conscience”.  And this is affirmed by none other than the modern & reputable “Blacks Law Dictionary 5th Ed, in defining the same term, as follows: 
“Infidel: One who does not believe in the existence of a God who will reward or punish in this world or in that which is to come.  One who professes no religion that can bind his conscience to speak the truth. One who does not recognize the inspiration or obligation of the Holy Scriptures, or generally recognized features of the Christian Religion.” 				

Yes. “Infidels” do “Not Recognize the Generally Recognized Features of the “Christian Religion”.  These are the precise words of none other than “Black’s Law Dictionary”, as published by the Omnipotent “West Publishing Company”, itself.  This is the Crux of the Entire Matter, & it is Not Hidden from those who have “eyes to see & ears to hear”.   This brings American Constitutional Jurisprudence right Home to Christ-Jesus; & there-fore to YHVH . 
As touched on above, a close Examination of the Traditions & Practices of the Pre-1066 Norman-Conquest British Peoples will Reveal that they Responsibly “Self-Governed” along that Precise Same-Model as Moses set forth in the Israelite “Torah”, as follows:   
“Tithing Man: A constable.  ... annually elected to preserve order ... and to make complaint of any dis-orderly conduct. ... the head or chief of a tithing or decennary of ten families; he was to decide all lesser causes between neighbors. In modern English Law, he is the same as an under-constable or peace-officer.” 
“Tithing: One of the civil divisions of England, being a portion of the greater division called a “hundred”. It was so called because ten freeholders with their families composed one. It is said that they were all knit together in one society, and bound ... for the peaceable behavior of each other. In each of these societies there was one chief or principle person, who, from his office, was called “teothing-man” now “tithing-man”.
Decanatus: A deaconry. A company of ten persons. Also a town or tithing consisting originally of ten families of freeholders. Ten tithings compose a hundred. 
Decanus: In Ecclesiastical & old European law, an officer having supervision over ten, a dean. A term applied not only to ecclesiastical, but to civil and military, officers. An officer among the Saxons who presided over a friborg, tithing, decannary, or association of ten inhabitants; otherwise called a “tithing man” or “borsholder”, his duties being those of an inferior judicial officer. Decanus militarius; a military officer having command of ten soldiers. In Roman law, an officer having the command of a company ... of ten soldiers. 	
Hundred: Under the Saxon organization of England, each county or shire was composed of an indefinite number of hundreds, each hundred containing ten tithings, or groups of ten families of freeholders or frank-pledges. The hundred was governed by a high constable, and had it’s own court; but its most remarkable feature was the corporate responsibility of the whole for the crimes or defaults of the individual members. The introduction of this plan of organization into England is commonly ascribed to Alfred, but the idea, as well of the collective liability as of the division, was probably known to the ancient German peoples, as we find the same thing established in the Frankish kingdom under Clothshire, and in Denmark. 1 Bl.Comm. 115; 4 Bl.Comm 411.              Black’s Law Dictionary; Fifth Edition, 1979. West Publishing Co., St Paul Minn.

These Citations show how the modernly un-fashionable “Common-Law” was functioning in early Britain. The Self-Governing “Hundred-Courts” as mentioned here-above, were most likely comparable to the old American “Precincts”.  This is affirmed by such greater insight as the following: 
“Origins of the Common Law”, Author R. Hogue, Professor of History at Harvard University;  
Copyright 1966 Indiana University Press, Reprinted by Liberty Fund Inc. 1985;  Pg 136:
... thirteenth century England was divided into counties, or shires, which in turn were divided into smaller units called “hundreds”, in the southern of England (“wapentakes” in Yorkshire, Lincolnshire, and Derbyshire, & “wards” in the northernmost counties).  The word “hundred” can safely stand for all the subdivisions of the counties.  Since the hundred was a very ancient Germanic institution, changes ... led to ... variations in the number of villages which composing the hundred, ... might contain as few as two or as many as twenty village communities. The county had its court, and the hundred also had a court ... . Of an estimated 628 hundreds in England, by the end of the thirteenth century 358 had (become) ...  “liberties” ... 

As referenced in the “Torah” Old-Testament of Moses & the New-Testament passages above, this all shows that the 10's, 50's, 100's & 1000's “Pattern” of De-Centralized “Self-Governing”, was Continuing on into the “Christian-Nations” which followed this ancient & well-settled body of “Common-Law”.  It had been long practiced among Anglo-Saxon, & Celtic, Germanic & other European Peoples, especially in the British Islands; from prior to the Norman Conquest of 1066 ad.  By this “Due Process of Law” the “Peace, Safety, & Happiness” of God’s People was to be effectively Secured.  Nothing Else Works, as Moses so discovered, & Christ-Jesus so affirmed.  
How Strange to note that those who “Say they are Jews” don’t follow this “Torah” Model.  Here-under, perhaps those ones are Not True “Jews”, but they merely “Say they are Jews” (just as described in Revelation 2:9 &3:9), all so that they can Self-Servingly Control the Mandate of Heaven, & Alienate Gods True “Chosen-People” from their Constitutional “Body-Politic” Heritage, under the True “King of the Jews” the Messiah/Christ-Jesus.  Perhaps Lord Coke was correct in Spirit, but merely errored in labeling them as “Jews” .  This “re-adjustment” of the “Indictment” against these peoples, would then need to be made for everyone who so Inflammatorily “Indicted” them, such as Martin-Luther, Benjamin-Franklin, George-Washington, Henry-Ford, & on and on. 

But the Main Point is that the “Self-Governing” Mandate of the Israelite/Christian Peoples continued on in the famous provisions of  Magna Carta Article 34 & 39, which read as follows:
(34) The writ called precipe shall not be served on anyone for any holding, if a free man could thereby be deprived of the right of trial in his own court. 
(39) No free man shall be seized or imprisoned, or stripped of his rights or possessions, or outlawed or exiled, or deprived of his standing in any other way, nor will we proceed with force against him, or send others to do so, except by the lawful judgement of his equals & the law of the land. 

This Magna-Charta Citation to “His Own Court” is probably referencing the “Hundred-Courts” as described above.  These provisions were written in Latin, & the latter (39) uses an “or” at that critical juncture where the last “&” appears.  Such translation leaves much wiggle-room for Centralization of Power for the Godless “Infidels”.  Lysander Spooner in his Heroic 1852 “Essay on Trail by Jury” blows that subversive fabrication to smithereens.  Do not be mislead by translations which follow that erroneous pathway into Confusion.  The only way the above provision makes any sense, is the way it reads above (or substantially similar), just as the great Spooner so sets forth. 

Modern American Jurisprudence:
All of these Ancient Laws have been Incorporated into the Constitutions of the American States by way of such provisions as follows:
US Constitution, 9th: Amendment: The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.
US Constitution, 10th Amendment: The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people. 
Oregon Constitution Article 1 Section 33. Enumeration of rights not exclusive. This enumeration of rights, and privileges shall not be construed to impair or deny others retained by the people.		

These Citations Show that the Ancient “Torah” Laws of Moses for the De-Centralized & Responsible “Self-Governing” of the Individual Communities of YHVH’s People have been Preserved within these Constitutions.  The Men who wrote these provisions were very serious about their Christianity, & they would not have even imagined otherwise. These provisions are Constitutional-Limitations on the Governing Authority of the “Civil-Servants” of this Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”, as well as for Washington D.C. .  To further show that this “State of Oregon” is Constitutionally Required to Conform to these Traditional Self-Governing “Common-Law” Principles, 
it is efficient to now consider such precedent as follows :
“Common Law - Adopted as Part of Laws of Oregon. The common law of England ... as it existed at the time of the American Revolution as far as it was general and not incompatible with the nature of our political institutions, or in conflict with the Constitution and laws of the United States or of Oregon has been adopted as part of the law of the state, in view of Article 1 Section 2, of the Organic Law of the Civil Government of Oregon, Adopted July 26, 1845, and of Constitution of 1857, Article 18 Section 7. 
United States F. & G. Co. v. Bramwell; 217 Pac. 332; 1923.

Take Note that the above clearly re-affirms that the Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon” is Firmly Based on the “Common-Law” of “Malum-In-Se”; & Not of that “Malum-Prohibitum” which has Despicably Crept into America’s Jurisprudence by way of the Roman Municipal Salve-Trading Codes, & the Secretive “Star-Chamber” Courts, under which Cloak of Darkness these “Infidels” need to Rely in order to work their Sociological Evils.  To further affirm this “Malum-In-Se” & “Common-Law” Basis of Oregon’s People’s Constitution, as well as for America as a whole, Note how 16th American Jurisprudence 2d,Summarizes the following:  
SS: 114: Constitutional Law: An important cannon of construction is that constitutions must be construed with reference to the common-law, since, in most respects, the federal and state constitutions did not repudiate, but cherished the established common law. ... the instrument & the plan of the government of the United States were founded on the common law as established in England at the time of the Revolution. Therefore, it is a general rule that phrases in the Bill of Rights taken from the common law must be construed in reference to the latter ... It is a cardinal rule of construction that a constitution must be construed as to give effect to the intention of the people who adopted it, and ... it will be construed with reference to the doctrines of the common law ... .	

This is a very powerful citation.  It ties everything together nicely.  This “Pattern” of De-Centralization of the Governing Authority is that precise “Pattern” upon which American “Federalism” is based.  Sadly, most Americans, & many Sheriff’s, Deputies, & Bailiff’s, & perhaps even many Judges; are quite Ignorant here-of.   This “Pattern” is set forth even further in a number texts, such as the following:   
Professor Hart; 54 Columbia Law Review 489-497; (1954); (As quoted in “Pleading & Procedure, State & Federal, Cases & Materials, Louisell, Hazard, & Thait, Professors from Berkeley, Yale, & U. of Connecticut; 1983, Foundation Press;  5th Edition):
“The law which governs daily living in the United States is a single system of law; it speaks in relation to any particular situation with only one ultimately authoritative voice, however difficult it may be on occasion to discern in advance which of two or more conflicting voices really carries authority. In the long run and in the large, this must be so. People repeatedly subjected, like Pablov’s dogs, to two or more inconsistent sets of directions, without means of resolving the inconsistencies, could not fail in the end to react like the dogs did. The society, collectively, would suffer a nervous breakdown.” 
“Yet the sources of the laws which say what Americans can, may or must do or not do ... are exceedingly diverse. The problems of developing the necessary mechanisms for evoking or enforcing harmony are correspondingly complex. 	* * *
“In any system of government, responsibility for doing these things is divided among the governments various branches. In the federal system, it is further divided among the government and the governments of the states and their political subdivisions.  * * * 
“Nowhere is the theory and practice of American federalism more significantly revealed than in the constitutions of the states. These constitutions assume responsibility for dealing, and claim authority to deal, with the whole gamut of problems cast up out of the flux of everyday life in the state, save only in the particular respects in which the Federal Constitution or statutes deprive the states of any competence whatever or provide for an overriding or displacing federal law.  They announce clearly, in Madison’s words, that whereas the powers of the federal government ‘consist of special grants taken from the general mass of power [we the state governments] possess the general mass with special exceptions only.” 

This all shows that the Precise Same Principles as set-forth in the Ancient Mosaic-Codes of De-Centralized Independent & Responsible “Self-Governing” were Preserved with in the Original-Intent of the U. S. Constitution.  This is the Repeating “Pattern” of Responsible “Self-Governing” which was sought within the above described “Circle of Christian Nations”.  The “King of the Jews” , the “Messiah of Israel”, Christ Jesus; has clearly revealed this Responsible “Self-Governing” Process, to be the Will of His Father: “YHVH”.  The Amount of Documentation in Support of these Concepts of a Religious Basis for the “Laws” of this Nation & State, is way beyond what is Efficient to place in this Memorandum.  But a very significant piece which further ties all of this together nicely, is as follows:  
Federalism (Theory): “Federal democracy is the authentic American contribution to democratic thought and republican government. Its conception represents a synthesis of the Puritan idea of the covenant relationship as the foundation of all proper human society and the constitutional ideas of the English natural rights school of the seventeenth & early eighteenth centuries. Contractual noncentralization - the structured dispersion of power among many centers whose legitimate authority is constitutionally guaranteed - is the key to the widespread and entrenched diffusion of power that remains the principle characteristic of and argument for federal democracy. 	
Federal democracy is a composite notion that includes a strong religious component. The religious expression of federalism was brought to the United States through the theology of the Puritan, who viewed the world as organized through binding covenants that God had made with mankind, binding God and man into a lasting union and partnership to work for the redemption of the world ... . ...
According to federal theology, all social and political relationships are derived from that original covenant. This theological perspective found its counterpart in congregationalism as the basis of church polity and the town meeting as the basis of civil polity. Thus communities of believers were required to organize themselves by covenant into congregations just as communities of citizens were required to organize themselves by covenant into towns. The entire structure of religious and political organization in New England reflected this application of a theological principle to social and political life. 
    ... The behavioral pattern resurfaced on every frontier ... in the wagon trains that crossed the plains, whose members compacted together to provide for their internal governance during the long trek westward. ...
In strictly governmental terms, federalism is a form of political organization that unites separate polities within an overarching political system, enabling all to maintain their fundamental political integrity and distributing power among general and constituent governments so that they all share in the system’s decision-making and executing processes. In a larger sense, federalism represents the linking of free people and their communities through lasting but limited political arrangements to protect certain rights or liberties and to achieve specific common ends while preserving their respective integrities. To reverse the order, federalism has to do, first and foremost, with a relationship among the entities, and then with the structure that embodies that relationship and provides the means for sustaining it. Originally federalism was most widely recognized as a relationship to which structural questions were incidental; but since the creation of the American federal system, in which a new structure was invented ... federalism has become increasingly identified in structural terms. This usage in turn has contributed to a certain emphasis on legal and administrative relations between the units and to the neglect of the larger question of the relationships federalism is designed to foster throughout the polity. 
Encyclopedia of the American Constitution; Leonard W. Levy, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont California. Kenneth L Karst, University of Southern California, Los Angeles. Dennis J. Mahoney, Claremont Graduate School, Claremont California. McMillian Publishing Co., New York; 1986

Here-under, it is Clear that “We the People” of America & Oregon are under Direction from YHVH to Form Our-selves into Smaller & Responsible “Self-Governing” “Social-Compacts”, all so-as-to Seek the “Justice” of “Almighty-God” with regard to in Any Matter which may come before Any of our Smaller “States”, & their 
“Political-Sub-divisions”.  This process for Securing Sociologically-Natural & Godly “Justice”, was “Alive & Well” under Early American Constitutional Jurisprudence. These Concepts have been Enshrined within the Constitutions of America & Oregon.  A profound documentation of this insight is well Illustrated by the following: 
“In America the refinement of the judge-jury relationship also occurred over a lengthy time period. The right of juries to decide questions of law was widely accepted in the colonies, especially in criminal cases. Prior to 1850, the judge and jury were viewed as partners in many jurisdictions. The jury could decide questions of both law and fact, and the judge helped guide the decision-making process by comments on the witnesses and the evidence. Legal theory and political philosophy emphasized the importance of the Jury in divining natural law, which was thought to be a better source for decision than the "authority of black letter maxim." Since natural law was accessible to lay people, it was held to be the duty of each juror to determine for himself whether a particular rule of law embodied the principles of the higher natural law. Indeed, it was argued that the United States Constitution embodied a codification of natural rights so that "the reliance by the jury on a higher law was usually viewed as a constitutional judgement * * *."
Civil Procedure; West PubCo.; Friedenthal, Kane & Miller, 1985; Pgs 476 & 477. 

Note the phrase “Divining Natural Law”. This clearly shows that the Jury worked-together, all so-as-to “Reason” upon how to do what was “Conscionable” in the eyes of YHVH.  That this process has fallen into disuse, & that those who propose to resurrect it, are facing Intense Opposition, all is strong Evidence that the Traditionally Recognizable “Infidels” who do Not Subscribe to “the generally recognized features of the Christian Religion” & who are “Not Bound by Conscience”, have Secured for them-selves Significant Influence within Modern American & Oregon Society.  They are clearly Directly-Opposed to the following provisions of Oregon’s Constitution: 
Section 2: “All men shall be secure in the Natural right, to worship Almighty God according to the dictates of their own consciences. 
Section 3: ... No law shall in any case whatever control the free exercise, and enjoyment of religeous opinions, or interfere with the rights of conscience. ... 
Section 7: The mode of administering an oath, or affirmation shall be such as may be most consistent with, and binding upon the conscience of the person to whom such oath or affirmation may be administered.”
Oregon Constitution; Article 1: Sub-sections. 

All of the above provisions come-together Logically & nicely.  How-ever, there is yet another Constitutional Citation in support of these specific concepts, which is perhaps the Most Powerful of all .  As set forth below, such is set forth in Oregon’s Constitution at Article 4 Section 23.  Here-under, is made one of the most Clear Provisions for Smaller Groups of “We the People” to exercise the full “Sovereignty” of this State, through our own “Special or Local” Jurisdictions, which are the proper “Political-Subdivisions” for “We the People” to Responsibly “Self-Govern” under of the full Sovereign Authority of this State, just as is Required under Godly “Common-Law”.  These “Special or Local” provisions are present in seemingly every State Constitution on America. Yet this author has found No Other State Constitutional Provision which explains these concepts in this kind of detail.  Oregon’s Founders were clearly well aware that these provisions were of Great Importance, & here-under they made it “Idiot-Proof” that These Specific “Self-Governing” Powers, were Constitutionally Vested in the Smaller “Special or Local” - “Self-Governing” Jurisdictions of “We the People”.  It reads as follows:
“Section 23. Certain local and special laws prohibited. The Legislative Assembly, shall not pass special or local laws, in any of the following enumerated cases, that is to say:
Regulating the jurisdiction, and duties of justices of the peace, and of constables; For the punishment of Crimes, and Misdemeanors; Regulating the practice in Courts of Justice; Providing for changing the venue in civil, and Criminal cases; Granting divorces; Changing the names of persons;
For laying, opening, and working on highways, and for the election, or appointment of supervisors;
Vacating roads, Town plats, Streets, Alleys, and Public squares; Summoning and empaneling grand, and petit jurors; For the assessment and collection of Taxes, for State, County, Township, or road purposes; Providing for supporting Common schools, and for the preservation of school funds; In relation to interest on money;
Providing for opening, and conducting the elections of State, County, and Township officers, and designating the places of voting; Providing for the sale of real estate, belonging to minors, or other persons laboring under legal disabilities, by executors, administrators, guardians, or trustees.”

This provision is Very Powerful.  Thank-you LeRoy Schweitzer.  By Reasonable Extrapolation, these Specific Constitutional Provisions give Detailed Explanations of what similar but less detailed provisions within  Other State Constitutions were “Originally-Intended” to mean.  Those Other Constitution’s Authors just didn’t have the Wisdom, so-as-to Insist that these details be preserved for posterity, as did Oregon’s Constitution’s Framers.  
And the heart of each of these “Special or Local” “Self-Governing” Jurisdictions, is their “Court of Justice”, just mentioned above.  These Constitutional “Courts of Justice” are recognized in Modern Oregon Statute at ORS 1.010; & herein they are recognized to possess Very Significant Powerful, as follows: 
“Every court of justice has power: ... (4) To compel obedience to its judgments, decrees, orders and process, & to the orders of a judge out of court, in an action, suit or proceeding pending therein. (5) To control, in furtherance of justice, the conduct of its ministerial officers, & of all other persons in any manner connected with a judicial proceeding before it, in every matter appertaining thereto.”

This kind of Power of Responsible “Self-Governing” is Vested in the People them-selves.  As is Clear, this is all Quite Powerful.  When coupled with the ability of the People, & our “Peace-Officers”; to Make Our Own Arrests, the Power of this Provision gains Bold Potential for bringing about True Harmony with Godly “Natural-Law”. It all “Fits-Together” Logically. Not Only do “We the People” have the Power to “Make Arrests”; but, through Our Own “Courts of Justice”, “We” have the Power to Try the Case by “Jury”, all so-as-to seek the “Natural-Laws” of  “Conscionable” Justice through the Unanimous 12 Person Decisions which are sought through “Due Process/Course of Law”, all under those Well-Settled, Traditional, & Godly “Maxims” known as the “Rules of the Common-Law”. 
This is all True precisely because Article 1 Section 1 of Oregon’s Constitution states that “All Power is Inherent in the People”.  This De-Centralized “Self-Governing” Power is in the very Nature of the Constitutional “Social-Compact” of this State. It reads as follows:
“We declare that all men, when they form a social compact are equal in right: that all power is inherent in the people, and all free governments are founded on their authority, and instituted for their peace, safety, and happiness; and they have at all times a right to alter, reform, or abolish the government in such manner as they may think proper.”

These are Not Empty Words.  The members of these Juries are “Joint-Tenants” within this “Socially-Compacted” & Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”.  This concept is recognized within the 1793 US Supreme Court case-law precedent of “Chisholm Ex'r. V. Georgia; (2 Dall. {U.S.} 419, 1 L.Ed. 440)”, which states: 
"The revolution, or rather the Declaration of Independence, found the people already united .... From the crown of Great Britain, the sovereignty of their country passed to the people of it; ... . ... "We the people of the United States, do ordain and establish this constitution." Here we see the people acting as sovereigns of the whole country; and in the language of sovereignty, establishing a constitution by which it was their will, that the state governments should be bound, and to which constitutions should be made to conform... 
It will be sufficient to observe briefly, that the sovereignties in Europe and particularly in England, exist on feudal principles. That system considers the prince as the sovereign, and the people his subjects; it regards his person as the object of allegiance, and excludes the idea of his being on an equal footing with a subject, either in a court of justice or elsewhere. That system contemplates him as being the fountain of honor and authority; and from his grace and grant, derives all franchises, immunities and privileges; it is easy to perceive, that such a sovereign could not be amendable to a court of justice, or subjected to judicial control and actual constraint... The same feudal ideas run through all their jurisprudence, and constantly remind us of the distinction between the prince and the subject. 
"No such ideas obtain here; at the revolution, the sovereignty devolved on the people; and they are truly the sovereigns of the country, but they are sovereigns without subjects... and have none to govern but themselves; the citizens of America are equal as fellow-citizens, and as joint tenants in the sovereignty. 
From the differences existing between feudal sovereignties and governments founded on compacts, it necessarily follows that their respective prerogatives must differ, Sovereignty is the right to govern; a nation or state sovereign is the person or persons in whom that resides. 
In Europe, the sovereignty is generally ascribed to the prince; here it rests with the people; there the sovereign actually administers the government; here never in a single instance; our governors are the agents of the people; and at most stand in the same relation to their sovereign, in which the regents of Europe stand to their sovereigns. Their princes have personal powers, dignities and preeminence, our rulers have none but official; nor do they partake in the sovereignty otherwise, or in any other capacity, than as private citizens."

This is another Very Powerful Case Precedent. Here-under, it is Clear that “We the People” Hold an “Undivided-Interest” in the Sovereignty of this “State of Oregon”, because that is how “Joint-Tenancy” is Defined in Black’s Law Dictionary.  We are Truly “Component-Members” in this “State of Oregon”.  It is Truly a “Body-Politic” under “Social-Compact”.  Further, “We” have “Duties” within our “Social-Compact” to “Defend the Rights” of our Fellow “Body-Politic” Members of this State.  This “State of Oregon” is Truly the “People of Oregon”.  
The term “State” is properly defined as:
“State: A self-sufficient body of persons united together in one community for the defense of their rights & to do right & justice to foreigners.  In this sense, the state means the whole people united into one body politic; & the state, & the people of the state are equivalent expressions.”   
John Bovier’s Law Dictionary of 1868. 
“State” is “A people ... bound together by common-law habits & custom into one body politic.” 									Blacks Law Dictionary (5th edtn)

These Citations are also Very Important.  Understanding that the “State”, Is the “People”; is of Critical Importance.  Frequently it is Assumed that the “Civil-Government”, Is the “State”. This is Grievous Error.  The “Civil-Government” merely frequently proceeds in the “Name of” the “State”.  It modernly does this so often, that this “Constitutional Confusion” is here-under Natural. This is especially true in the light that many Corrupted “Civil-Servants” are quite happy in Assuming this Extra Power over other members of the “Body-Politic”.  There-under, they habitually do not correct this Error. The Fact is that Any “Private Party” Person in this State, has Full Authority to proceed in the “Name of the State”.  Such is “Required” by our Constitutional “Social-Compact”, & it is born out by such Good Statutes as ORS 30.510, as follows: 
“ORS 30.510: Action for usurpation of office or franchise.
An action at law may be maintained in the name of the state, upon the information of the district attorney, or upon the relation of a private party against the person offending, in the following cases:
(1) When any person usurps, intrudes into, or unlawfully holds or exercises any public office, civil or military, or any franchise within this state, or any office in a corporation either public or private, created or formed by or under the authority of this state; or,
(2) When any public officer, civil or military, does or suffers an act which, by the provisions of law, makes a forfeiture of the office of the public officer; or,
(3) When any association or number of persons acts within this state, as a corporation, without being duly incorporated.						

These “Rights” of “Private Party” Persons to Proceed in the “Name of the State”, by way of their “Relation” to the State, is clearly recognized above.  And “Why” does this “Relation” of these “Private Parties” to the “State” Allow for them to Proceed thusly?  It is Because they are Truly “Joint-Tenants” with an “Undivided-Interest” in the Actual Sovereignty of this Constitutional “State of Oregon” itself.  Very, Very Powerful.  
Here-under it is Clear that this “Right” for Smaller “Special & Local” Jurisdictions to “Self-Govern” is well founded in the “Constitutional-Law” of America & Oregon.  Such is well recognized in the following:
“The continued existence of a free & democratic Society depends on recognition of the concept that justice is based on the rule of law grounded in respect for the dignity of the individual & his capacity through reason for enlightened self-government. Law so grounded makes justice possible, for only through such law does dignity of the individual attain respect & protection. Without it, individual rights become subject to unrestrained power, respect for law is destroyed, & rational self-government is impossible.”
Preamble. American Bar Assn.; Model Code of Professional Responsibility (Amended), 1981

When an Accusation has been brought before one of the above mentioned “Courts of Justice” by a “Body-Politic” Member in “Social-Compact” to this Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”, then by way of this “Social-Compact”, the Twelve-Person Jury there-in does Owe “Duty” to “Almighty-God” YHVH, & All of their fellow Oregonians, including the Accused, to make Sufficient Inquiry into the alleged Merits of the Accusation which has issued against him, & thereby to “Administer Justice”, precisely as Quickly as such becomes possible.  A Quick Verdict is to be sought so long as “Due Process/Course of Law” is not compromised, because of the “Without Delay” obligation which is recognizable under Article 1 Section 10 of Oregon’s Constitution; which significant section reads:
“No court shall be secret, but justice shall be administered, openly and without purchase, completely and without delay, and every man shall have remedy by due course of law for injury done him in his person, property, or reputation.”

A Quick Verdict works extra benefit to the People because, by way of the Constitutional Prohibitions Against “Double Jeopardy”, it Prohibits the Civil/Municipal Courts from taking any further Jurisdiction.  This is just as set forth in Oregon’s Constitution as follows: 
Article 1, Section 12: Double jeopardy; compulsory self-incrimination. No person shall be put in jeopardy twice for the same offence , nor be compelled in any criminal prosecution to testify against himself.”

“Treason” Masquerading as mere “Emergencies” 	
Oregon’s Constitution has undergone some suspicious alterations.  It appears that “Acts of War” against this Constitutionally Lawful “State of Oregon” are being perpetrated by way of one or more Criminal-Conspiracies among Corrupted Public/Civil-Servants.  It appears to us that these Criminal-Conspirators have Usurped Authority to Bamboozle otherwise Honorable Public/Civil-Servants into going along with them.  It appears that these Evils are happening by way of various “Declarations of Emergency” which have been produced by Oregon’s Legislative-Assembly, which all gives “Color of Legitimacy” to said Constitutionally Lawless Usurpations.  These purported “Emergencies” have been used as “Justification” to “Work-Around” the Constitutional Safe-Guards which have been Guaranteed to “We the People” of this State, all without “We the People” having been given any Reasonable Notification of said “Emergencies”.  The fact that Reasonable Notification to “We the People” of Oregon has Not Been Given;  is reflected by the secondary fact that most of the People (& possibly even many Legislators & Judges) will Deny that this is presently being used as Excuse for  Divergence form Constitutional Requirements for our State’s Governmental procedures.  Evidence in support of these purposefully obscured Facts are as follows:
State Ex Rel Madden V. Crawford; (207 Or Mar. 56) (1956) 295 P.2d 174; Pages 80 - 90. 
“... The question is an important and delicate one ... We cannot, however, take into account considerations of expediency  ... Under ss 1 of Art 7, prior to the amendment of 1910, the judicial power of the state was vested in a supreme court, circuit courts, and county courts, but under the 1910 amendment, circuit courts and county courts were not mentioned.  Hence, under ss 1 of Art 7, as amended in 1910, the Supreme Court is the only court created by the Constitution itself; all other courts are to be created by legislative act. However, it was to prevent a hiatus in the administration of justice pending action by the legislature that the first portion of ss 2 of Art 7, as amended in 1910 was adopted. ...  

This Citation shows that Oregon’s Trail-level “Circuit-Courts” are Not with-in the “Judicial-Department”, as is a Requirement of the Republican Form of Civil-Government; all within which the Parameters our Constitutional Democracy is Lawfully Required to Operate.  Both this Citation & Common-Knowledge reveal that both the “Separation of Powers” Doctrine & its accompanying system of “Checks & Balances” have entirely Broken Down.  This was the Theoretical Bulwark to Keep the People’s Public/Civil-Servants From Usurping the “Master” Position Over Them by way of Perversions of the Constitutionally Authorized Civil/Municipal Master/Servant Relationships. 
Here-under, the Judiciary at the Trail level is no-longer “Independent” but has now come to be concerned with the Agenda from which it derives it’s authority, ie: the Legislative Agenda, & that being compromised, the barrier is now down also for being compromised by the Executive Agenda, & every other Private Special-Interest-Group which wields any degree of Influence.  Those who defend this situation, will point out that the Supreme-Court is still purportedly “Independent”, thus maintaining “Separation of Powers”.  However, this is a hollow-token of the substantive Constitutional Guarantee, because for the People, it is a practical impossibility to be able to get a case to that Supreme Court & its Judicial Power, without first going through the Compromised Circuit-Courts.  Thus, the Supreme-Court never reviews a Controversy which has been adjudicated by a Judicial Power, which all makes the entire structure Compromised with regard to Minimal-Constitutional-Requirements of Republicanism.
Further, under the Amended/Supplanted Article 7 (which purports to Govern the Judiciary of the State), that “one supreme court” in which the “Judicial Power” of the State is vested, is spelled with all lower case letters, & it is referenced in these same lower-case letters as “supreme court” about Ten (10) Times in this Amended/Supplanted Article 7.  In the very same Amended/Supplanted Article 7, the words “Supreme Court”, with the FIRST LETTERS CAPITALIZED, appears in later provisions Seven (7) Times, & it is clearly that “Court” under which the Present “Supreme Court” is operating.  It seems un-reasonable to have Two Different Forms of Capitalization in the very same Amended/Supplanted Article 7, both there-in referring to a “Supreme Court”.   It seems much more likely that the second “Supreme Court”, is a Different “Supreme Court” than the “one supreme court” which is referenced in Section 1 & elsewhere, & in which the “Judicial Power of the State Shall Be (actually) Vested”.  It seems extremely improbable that 90 Years of Secretary of States of Oregon, would not Notice the Dysfunctional & Inconsistent Capitalizations of the terms “Supreme Court” in this Article, & there-by Attempt to Correct it with at least their annoying “sic” notations, as they so liberally throw about in the Original Article Seven, thereby “making mountains out of mole-hills” for the quaint breaches of the “Queens English” contained there-in.  No, there is Something Significant going on here, or the Inconsistency would have been corrected by the busy-body bean-counters.  
Here-under, it appears that what is passing as the present “Supreme-Court” for this “State of Oregon”, is Not even Constitutionally Charged with the actual “Judicial Power” of the State.  Here-under, it appears as though what is passing as the “Civil-Government” of this “State of Oregon” does Not even Have Any Court under it’s authority which is actually Exercising any Constitutionally -Lawful “Judicial-Power”.  This is incredible. 

The “Hiatus” mentioned in the Madden Case above, is clearly making reference to an “Emergency” type of situation.  And though our opportunity to research the recent enactments of the States Legislature is limited, we are aware that very many of them contain “Emergency” clauses, which thereby purportedly “Justifies” their being applied by these Non-Judicial Courts Outside of the Limitations of the “Chains of the Constitution”.  In Clackamas County, the Commissioners have admitted by default that “Over Half of the Ordinances currently in place contain these Declaration of Emergency clauses” thus purportedly making them so enforceable by these Non-Judicial Courts.  We presume that the same general numbers are true at the State-level.  
The fact that these “Declarations of Emergency” are profoundly affecting the Lives of the People of Oregon is reflected by work on the Federal-level by the United States Senate, as:
Emergency Powers Statutes; A Brief Historical Sketch of the Origins of Emergency Powers Now in Force; Senate Report No. 93.549; November 19, 1973. 
A majority of the people of the United States have lived all of their lives under emergency rule. For 40 years, freedoms and governmental procedures guaranteed by the Constitution have, in varying degrees, been abridged by laws brought into force by states of national emergency.  The problem of how a constitutional democracy reacts to great crisis, however, far antedates the Great Depression. As a philosophical issue, its origins reach back to the Greek city-states and the Roman Republic. And, in the United States, actions taken by the Government in times of great crisis have - from, at least, the Civil War - in important ways shaped the present phenomenon of a permanent state of national emergency. American political theory of emergency government was derived from John Locke, the English-political-philosopher whose thought influenced the authors of the Constitution. Locke argued that the threat of national crisis — unforseen, sudden, and potentially catastrophic — required the creation of broad executive emergency powers to be exercised by the Chief Executive in situations where the legislative authority had not provided a means or procedure of remedy.  Referring to emergency power in the 14th chapter of his Second Treatise on Civil Government as “prerogative”, Locke suggested that it:
... should be left to the discretion of him that has the executive power ... since in some governments the lawmaking power is not always in being and is usually too numerous and too slow for the dispatch requisite to executions, and because, also it is impossible to foresee and so by laws to provide for all accidents and necessities that may concern the public, or make such laws as will do no harm, if they are executed with an inflexible rigour on all occasions and upon all persons that may come in their way, therefore there is a latitude left to the executive power to do many things of choice which the laws do not prescribe. ... ” 

This document clearly shows that “A Permanent State of National Emergency”, is effecting the Constitutionally Guaranteed Liberties of every Patriotic American, including “We the People” of Oregon.  This ties-in with the Madden-case above, to show that the “Hiatus, in the Administration of Justice” there-in referred to, is Negatively-Affecting the “Governmental Procedures Guaranteed by the Constitution”, on both Federal & State levels.  The Madden-case refers to Article 7, upon which the State’s Judiciary was Re-Organized by purported Amendment, back in 1910.  The head-note between the Amended & Original versions of Article 7 of Oregon’s Constitution which Govern the Judiciary of the State’s Civil Government, clearly uses the problematic term “Supplant”, as follows: 
“Original Article VII, compiled below, has been supplanted in part by amended Article VII and in part by statutes enacted by the Legislative Assembly.” 

The use of this term “Supplant” herein is Defined in reputable Dictionaries as follows:
Random House Contemporary 1957: “Replace & Supplant both ... convey different senses. ... Supplant implies that which takes the others place has ousted the former holder, & usurped the position or function, especially by art of fraud .” 
Random House College 1968: “1. To take the place of , as through force, scheming, or the like.”
Oxford Universal 1937:  “3. To supersede (another), esp by force, trickery, or treachery; to usurp the place or possessions of. 4. To uproot... .” 

These words reflect most grievous concern.  These words reflect that “Bad-Faith” has been Perpetrated by a Powerful Private Special-Interest-Group which is Hostile to the “General-Welfare” of “We the People” of this Constitutional “State of Oregon”.  Here-under, it is Reasonably-Construable that these above mentioned & so-called “Declarations of Emergency” are nothing more than Fabrications to Deceive the People, & to Undermine the Constitutionally Required Concepts of Responsible-Democratic/Republican “Self-Government”.  This is one of the Most Significant Citations in Support of the accusation that “Treason” is being Committed amongst a Conspiratorial Cabal of Evil Men who are Knowingly & Willfully Subverting Constitutionally Required Judicial Process. 
Take Note of how 16th American Jurisprudence 2d Summarizes the effects of Un-Constitutional Activities:
"The general rule is that an unconstitutional statute, though having the form and name of law, is in reality no law, but is wholly void, and ineffective for any purpose; since unconstitutionality dates from the time of it's enactment, and not merely from the date of the decision so branding it. An unconstitutional law, in legal contemplation, is as inoperative as if it had never bn passed.  . . .  Such an unconstitutional law is void, the general principles follow that it imposes no duties, confers no rights, creates no office, bestows no power or authority to anyone, affords no protection, and justifies no acts preformed under it  ... . ...  insofar as a statute runs counter to the fundamental law of the land, it is superseded thereby. No one is bound to obey an unconstitutional law and no courts are bound to enforce it . ... The fact that one acts in reliance on a statute which has theretofore been adjudged unconstitutional does not protect him from civil or criminal responsibility ...      SS: 256 & 257.    

Note that there are No Lawful Protections Available to those who Subvert the Constitution ! The citations presented thus-far here-in, Clearly Prove that this “State of Oregon” is Firmly Based on the “Common-Law”, & as You Judges are surely aware, this affirms the Doctrine of “Malum In Se”, aka: “Wrong in it’s Self”.  Here-under, both an “Evil-Intent” & a “Breach of the Peace” are “Required” to be “Proven” in the Accused, all Before Any “Force” within this State may Lawfully be brought to bear against Him/Her .  If these Elements are Not Shown, then the activities are with that “Great-Repository” of the “Liberties” of “We the People”, just as is described in the Preambles of Both of the Constitutions of Oregon, & of the United States of America.  This precise Same-Concept is again Redundantly Protected in the other words of the People’s “Rights of Conscience”, just as set forth in Article 1 Section 3 of Oregon’s Constitution, as previously described here-in.  
In America & Oregon, a Person is “Innocent Until Proven Guilty”.  This is a well-settled “Maxim of Law”, as shown by the following Citation in Black’s Law Dictionary, 5th Edition: 
“Presumption of Innocence: A hallowed principle of criminal law to the effect that the government has the burden of proving every element of a crime beyond a reasonable doubt and that the defendant has no burden to prove his innocence.  It arises at the first stage of the criminal process ...  Presumption of innocence succinctly conveys the principle that no person may be convicted of a crime unless the Government carries the burden of proving his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt ...” 

The manner for Proving People “Guilty” of Crimes, is by Well-Settled & Traditional “Due Process of Law”.  Here-under, any Break-Down (“Hiatus”) in the “Due Process of Law” Should Shut-Down the Ability of the Constitutionally-Lawful Civil-Government to Arrest & Imprison Anyone.  But this is Not Happening, as the Massive Numbers of People in Prison so Bear Witness.  Here-under, “We the People” are being Presumed “Guilty”, Instead of being “Presumed Innocent” (as the Constitutional Common-Law Maxims above her e-in REQUIRE) ! This is the Precise Reversal of the Constitutional Requirements !  The People who are Acting in the furtherance of such proceedings as these are Administering “Force” Against “We the People” who by the Very Nature of our Constitutional “Social-Compact”, We do Lawfully Compose this “State of Oregon” it’s-self.  This is effectively War against the People them-selves, & there-fore also Against Our Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon” it’s-self.   

The Baseless Accusation which these Documents are Defending Against are all based on Private “Municipal-Law”.  They  are Private “Malum-Prohibitum”.  They do Not respect the “Liberties” of “We the People”, Nor our “Rights of Conscience”, Nor the “Chains of the Constitution”.  It is all “Private-Law” such as perhaps the “Synagogue of Satan” may choose to exercise among It’s Own Religious Members, all under the “Liberal” Tolerances for Private “Self-Governing” Entities to set-up their own Private “Special or Local” Governments with-in this State.  But this Requires Reasonable & Clear “Consent to be Governed” there-by, before it can be Enforced against any Accused within this State.  
Any such “Accused” would be Insane to “Consent” to such a Human Meat-Grinder.  Here-under, such “Consent” is Frequently Summarily “Presumed” over such a Targeted Person, all by way of “Silent Judicial Notice”.  This in turn Necessitates “Secret-Court” Proceedings, which are again Prohibited under Article 1 Section 10 of Oregon’s Constitution (as quoted above).  Those entities were Constitutionally Prohibited because they are the very Essence of the old “Star-Chamber” & “Shetar” style of abuses of old England, where-in the Non-Christian “Infidels” had Gained Control, & there-in were Cutting Off Hands & Feet for such Failure to Pay on Debts. 

Note that any such “Consent” is modernly recognized to Require a “Legal-Nexus” to the Private & purportedly “Self-Governing” - “Malum-Prohibitum” entity .  This Requirement is also known as the Requirement for “Minimal-Contacts”.  Courts may Not “Silently” “Presume” these “Minimal-Contacts” to Exist.  Such is “Treason”, for it works a Gross Un-Fair-ness by Prohibiting the Accused form being Fully-Informed of the “Nature & Cause” of the Accusation Against Him, as is Required in Oregon’s Constitution at Article 1 Section 11, as follows:
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall have the right to public trial by an impartial jury in the county in which the offense shall have been committed; to be heard by himself and counsel; to demand the nature and cause of the accusation against him, and to have a copy thereof; to meet the witnesses face to face, and to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor.

Such “Silent-Judicial-Notice” of “Minimal Contacts” is further in Direct-Violation of the “Justice Shall Be Administered OPENLY” as Directly Required in Article 1 Section 10 (again, as previously set forth here-in).  
There are So Many Modes of proceeding being currently practiced in the Civil Courts of Oregon which are in Direct-Violation of the Many Fundamental Provisions of Oregon’s Constitution, that it is hard to know where to start.  Those Persons who purport to be “Judicial-Officers” within this State’s Civil-Government, & who Proceed to Violate the Rights of an Accused Person after having been presented with This Exhaustive Documentation of the Direct-Subversion of the Constitutional Safeguards of “We the People”, are clearly Knowingly & Willfully engaging in a “Pattern” of “Overt-Acts” which are also being Committed by Many Other Corrupted “Judicial Officers” against Multitudes of Innocent Oregonians.  Clearly, “Treason” Charges are within the bounds of Reason, against such a one. 

Note that an Act of Constitutionally-Lawless Violence against any Natural-Person is an “Act of War” against that particular Person.  Note further that because it is “Common-Knowledge” that Constitutionally-Lawless “Malum-Prohibitum” is being “Presumptiously” Enforced against “We the People”, all through what passes as a Civil “Judiciary” for this good “State of Oregon”, here-under a Wide-Spread  “Pattern” of “Overt Acts of War” are being Perpetrated Un-Fairly & Maliciously Against Multitudes of this State’s Unsuspecting Individual Members.  Here-under, these “Infidels” who have effectively Conspiratorially Organized themselves so-as-to advance under “Color of Law” with this kind of a “Pattern” of “Overt Acts of War” against Individual Oregonians, are Also in “Overt Acts of War” against this good Constitutional “State of Oregon” itself.  Once Again, “The People” Are “The State”. 
Take Note that the Crime of “Treason” is quite similar to the ORS 166.715-4 RICO/Racketeering “Pattern” of Multiple “... incidents ... that have the same or similar intents, results, accomplices, victims or methods of commission or otherwise are interrelated by distinguishing characteristics, including a nexus to the same enterprise, and are not isolated incidents, ...”. Take Note that this Class A Felony of Racketeering is focused merely on Economic Crimes, & it does Not Address any of the More Serious “Breaches of the Peace”.  It is there-fore Reasonable to Construe that when such precise Same “Pattern” Escalates to the even More Serious “Breach of the Peace”, that the “Class A Felony” punishments prescribed by this Economics-based Statute (& those in accompaniment there-to, such as ORS 166.720), are Inadequate for the Punishment of such More Serious Offences.  
Here-under, it is Reasonable to Construe that such “Pattern” of “Breach of the Peace” Against the People who Lawfully Compose this “State of Oregon”, do Deserve Greater Punishment than that which is authorized by the “Class A Felony” Racketeering Statute.  The Only Crimes which secure Greater Punishments than “Class A Felony” under Oregon Statutes are “Murder” & “Treason”.  Hereunder, it is Reasonable to construe that “Treason” is an applicable Label for this More Serious “Pattern” of Violent & Subversive Activity, & that this is Truly a “Pattern” of “War” against the Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”.  It is reasonable to Construe that this “War” is being Perpetrated by certain Mal-Feasant Civil-Servants who Abuse their Position of Trust as Public-Officers, all so-as-to Administer Lawless Violence Against “We the People” of this “State of Oregon”.    
Take Note that it is Common Knowledge amongst the People that there is a Wide-spread Epidemic of a “Long Train of Abuses & Usurpations” amongst a Cabal of Corrupted Governmental “Civil-Servants”, all so-as-to Conspiratorially Administer Lawless Violence, & all Conspiratorially “Pursuing Invariably the Same Object”, which Object does clearly “Evi(de)nce a Design” to Fundamentally Alter the Fundamental Form of Constitutional Republican Government for this Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”, & to thereby “Reduce (We the People) to Defenseless & Helpless Slaves “under Absolute Despotism”.  These Modern Evils are the Precise Same as caused the “Declaration of Independence” to Issue, & were the Lawful-Cause for the Taking up of Arms by “We the People” against the Evil Tyrant King George.  But it was more accurately a Taking up of Arms Against that Ancient & Evil Religious Cabal of International Money Changers & Private “Special-Interest-Group” Power-Brokers who centered about the “Bank of England”, & which held Evil George’s Purse-Strings.  These had as Direct Ancestors the Money-Changers who had their Tables Turned-Over by Christ-Jesus, & it is They who effectively amount to the “Great Whore Babylon” as described in Revelation Chapters 17 & 18, as they Sell & “Buy ... Slaves & the Souls of Men” in their sought-after Evil Anti-Trust Monopoly over All of the Commerce of All of God’s Once Beautiful Planet Earth.   
The Accused has Rights to be heard by “Assistance of Council”, & to hear the “Nature & Cause” of the Accusation against him Clearly Explained, just as set forth in Article 1 Section 11 of Oregon’s Constitution above. 
The Accused has Rights to the Security of his Own “Court of Justice”, just as described above in Article 4 Section 23 of Oregon’s Constitution;, & the Jury Trail Verdicts as issued there-from are to be Respected. 
The Courts receiving these Judgements & Verdicts are Required by “General-Law” Principles of “Comity”, to give “Full Faith & Credit”, & Respect to these Judgements & Verdicts.  This all holds True unless something is clearly out-of order on the very Face of the Documents.  But because the Phone Numbers & EMail Addresses of the Chief Justice of the Peace of this Court is on those very Documents, Any Legitimate Questions as-to their Conformity with “Due Process/Course of Law” &/or “the Rules of the Common-Law” can very-easily be put to rest. It is not like someone has to climb on a horse and ride to the other side of the state or something to verify these matters, as was the “General-Law” concern for “Administration of Justice” back when the Constitution was drafted.  There is No Legitimate Excuse for Dis-Respecting these “Court of Justice” Judgements & Verdicts.  This “Respect” & “Comity” is Required by the “Rules of the Common-Law” just as Set-Forth in the 7th Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. 

Further, the Amended-Supplanted Article 7 Section 2b of Oregon’s Constitution, Describes it’s Own Jurisdiction’s Courts as “Inferior Court” Tribunals, who’s Judgements are “Not-With-Standing the provisions of” Article 4 Section 23, which there-in contain the Sovereign-People’s “Courts of Justice”.  This Citation Clearly Shows that the so-called “Courts” of the Civil Government are Constitutionally “Inferior” to this Peoples Sovereign Jurisdictional “Courts of Justice”.  This People’s Juris-Diction begrudgingly admits that provisions such as these 
are basically good in this other-wise lawless usurpation which presently purports to Govern Oregon’s Judiciary . The section we refer to reads as follows:
Section 2b. Inferior courts may be affected in certain respects by special or local laws.
Notwithstanding the provisions of section 23, Article IV of this Constitution, laws creating courts inferior to the Supreme Court or prescribing and defining the jurisdiction of such courts or the manner in which such jurisdiction may be exercised, may be made applicable:
(1) To all judicial districts or other subdivisions of this state; or (2) To designated classes of judicial districts or other subdivisions; or (3) To particular judicial districts or other subdivisions.

This clearly shows that those Amended/Supplanted Article 7 so-called “Courts” are “Not-With-Standing the Provisions of Section 23 of Article 4 of this Constitution".   That means that those “Courts” which are Created by those Legislative Enactments are “Not-With-Standing” to the Article 4 Section 23 “Courts of Justice”.  Those “Courts” are “Inferior-Courts”, in that they do Not exercise the Sovereignty of this Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”.  This is just as they are so identified above.  They are under “Legal Disability”.  This applies to the Circuit, Municipal, & Appellate Courts of this State of Oregon, & perhaps even the Supreme Court itself.  Here-under, as directed in the accompanying Documents, the Judges of those so-called “Courts” are Required by their own “Supplanted” Source of Authority, to “BACK-OFF”, when they see a Jury-Verdict (or other process) Issuing from a proper Peoples Sovereign “Court of Justice”, such as this one.  
Those Courts don’t even exercise a True “Judicial-Power”, precisely as so shown in the Madden v Crawford case further above.  The Madden case clearly draws a Distinction between those Courts which exercise the “Judicial Power” & those “Courts” which are “Created by Legislative Act”.  Every Trail-Level Court of the Civil-Government of Oregon is “Created by Legislative Act”, & there-fore Not exercising a Constitutional “Judicial Power”.  Those so-called “Courts” are more properly exercising a “Municipal” Power, & these Fundamental Concepts of Constitutional-Law are affirmed by the Following Citations taken from the “Words & Phrases” volumes:
“Municipal corporations” are created by the legislature, they derive all their powers from the source of their creation, and those powers are at all times subject to the control of the legislature. St. Joseph Tp. V. Rogers, 83 U.S. 644, 16 Wall, 21 L.Ed. 326. 
Municipalities are instrumentalities of the government and their creation involves exercise of “governmental power” as distinguished from “judicial power”. In re City of Berkley, Mo.App., 155 S.W.2d 138, 140. 
... “municipal” pertains to local self-government similar to that of Roman municipum ... being used in contradistinction to international law. State v. Grange, 165 N.E. 239, 240, 200 Ind. 506. 
Municipal Corporations are voluntary associations created and built upon voluntary assent of the community and its citizens. Carey v. City of Haleyville, 161 So. 496, 497, 230 Ala.401. 

Any Jury Verdict in accompaniment here-to is here-by exercising it's Constitutionally-Lawful “Juris-Diction” to render Judgement that any there-in described “Malum-Prohibitum” Accusations are Lawless.  Such Accusations are there-in adjudicated to be just a few more in a Series of Acts of an Epidemic of Constitutionally-Lawless Usurpations by a Small but Extremely Powerful Private “Special-Interest-Group” which is perpetrating a Conspiracy to Treasonously to Corrupt the “Civil-Servants” of this Constitutionally-Lawful “State of Oregon”.  
Here-by, the Conspirators do clearly Evidence an Intent of Seeking Assistance from Corrupted “Civil-Servants” in this Evil Enterprise by Mis-Using the “Force” of this State under “Color of Law”, all  so-as-to Reduce “We the People” here-in to a sub-human Class of Slaves.  This all flows from Multitudes of Fraudulently Proclaimed “Emergencies” (as here-in shown), which have been Contrived upon Superficial Grounds; & all of which Amount To a “Bad-Faith” “Work-Around” of the “Originally-Intended” Constitutional-Limitations placed upon the “Civil-Servants” of this State’s Civil-Government.  Here-under, Constitutionally-Lawless Summary/Military Proceedings & Violence & Terrorism are Routinely being used in “Assembly-Line” fashion & “Bad-Faith” to Effect an Epidemic of Abuses of the Constitutionally Secured Rights of “We the People”.   It is like Cattle in the Slaughter House.   
It is “Treason” for a Judge of one of these “Inferior-Courts”, aka: “Municipal-Courts”; to Proceed with Violence, After he has been Properly Presented with a Constitutionally-Lawful Jury-Verdict from another Lawful Juris-Diction.  Such would amount to his Setting-up of His Own “Separate-Sovereignty” all Antagonistic to the Fundamental Constitutional Principles of this “State of Oregon”, & there-by  “Waging-War” Against it.  These Rights to “Jury Trial” are Sacred Doctrine, & to Proceed against such is “Obstruction of Justice”, & “High Treason”. 
This is all further re-enforced within the same Amended/Supplanted Article 7, as follows:
Section 3. ... the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, & no fact tried by a jury shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of this state, unless the court can affirmatively say there is no evidence to support the verdict.

(The above provisions of  “Unless ... there is No Evidence”,  Only Applies with-in the “Civil-Jurisdiction”.  This is True because as Section 2b clearly shows, the Legislatively Created so-called “Courts” are “Not-With-Standing” & “Inferior” to our Sovereign Peoples “Courts of Justice”.  The above exception does not purport to extend the Juris-Diction of those Courts so-as-to Disallow our “Courts of Justice” Jury Verdicts, even if they could articulate an argument to the effect that there was “No Evidence”.  It’s not their call to make.)    

Do Not Violate Any of these Fundamental Constitutional-Rights of Any of “We the People” in Any Manner What-So-Ever, Including Our Right to Responsibly “Self-Govern” under our Own Jury-Trial Process.  Remember:   
          “Ignorantia Legis Neminem Excusat”, ie: “Ignorance of Law is No Excuse.” (Black’s 5th Law Dictionary)

Do Not Commit “Treason”. 
Submit to the Higher Authority of YHVH. 

This document has been composed by:

                                                                                                                                
Chief Justice of the Peace: Charles Bruce, Stewart;  
for the “Christian/Israelite Common-Law Court of Justice, for the People of Oregon” 
Co: 19164 Barrington Avenue; 
Sandy Oregon, [97055]; 
503-668-5091
EMail: charles@christiancommonlaw-gov.org ; 
Web page: http://www.christiancommonlaw-gov.org/